Tebow despite being in accurate throws an accurate go route or other variations of it (sluggo, double move etc). Saying Tebows long completions vs Pitt is a stretch.
Also Denver doesn't really run an option offense. They have installed a few option plays in the playbook but they are getting further and further away from them.
And saying New England is good for 35 to 40 points every game is inaccurate. They can score that many points but I wouldn't rely on them too.
If you enjoy Advanced NFL Stats, please consider a small donation to The Fisher House, a place where families of injured servicemen can stay while visiting their hospitalized heroes.
Interested in publishing your own football research, analysis, or stat-based commentary? Advanced NFL Stats Community is the site to share your thoughts and ideas. There's plenty of data available to get started. All submissions will be accepted and published. Check it out!
Your link is to the old podcast.
ReplyDeletethe right one...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fangraphs-audio-brian-burke-advanced-nfl-stats-2/
fixed, thanks
ReplyDeleteTebow despite being in accurate throws an accurate go route or other variations of it (sluggo, double move etc). Saying Tebows long completions vs Pitt is a stretch.
ReplyDeleteAlso Denver doesn't really run an option offense. They have installed a few option plays in the playbook but they are getting further and further away from them.
And saying New England is good for 35 to 40 points every game is inaccurate. They can score that many points but I wouldn't rely on them too.
/End Bronco rant