tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post1787505185222167894..comments2009-09-03T01:08:25.692-04:00Brian Burkenoreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-79163311517078001022009-09-03T01:08:25.692-04:002009-09-03T01:08:25.692-04:00im freaking out...can you find something like these for nflAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-48612925172312023262009-04-29T23:57:00.000-04:002009-04-29T23:57:00.000-04:00John-You're correct. I use what's called 'Net Passing Efficiency' which includes sack yards.Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-3257235776238947422009-04-29T20:59:00.000-04:002009-04-29T20:59:00.000-04:00Hi Brian,<br />I could be wrong about this but I can't get to the numbers in your example w/o not subtracting the sack yards. For example:<br />Team APY SACK APA OPASS PY/PA<br />Ari 2481 182 350 6.57 7.1<br /><br />2481 / 350 = 7.1 I could have a problem with my data but I have been over it a few times. <br /><br />Thanks.<br />JohnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-90131180306868517772009-02-02T00:54:00.000-05:002009-02-02T00:54:00.000-05:00Here is another approach<BR/><BR/>http://www.chinapost.com.tw/sports/american-football/2009/01/31/194038/Wall-St..htmjarheadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4432656508242163572009-02-01T23:36:00.000-05:002009-02-01T23:36:00.000-05:00Including the playoffs, the final record is 135-69-1.Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-8731525024608066132009-01-31T12:31:00.000-05:002009-01-31T12:31:00.000-05:00Can z explane theese estimated Burker Berzerker Indecks pleez? Does these track to the same satisfactional reliability of famed Dow Jonas Indecks?Borathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05801713391906994668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-35621821641904481482009-01-29T23:10:00.000-05:002009-01-29T23:10:00.000-05:00Wow.Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-68529492294867225632009-01-29T16:07:00.000-05:002009-01-29T16:07:00.000-05:00Anon- not sure if this is what you meant, but...<BR/>2008 results in win % picking straight up:<BR/>Vegas Opening line = .653<BR/>Vegas Closing line = .664<BR/>The esteemed Burker Berzerker Index = .663znoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-31137955209547154742009-01-29T02:35:00.000-05:002009-01-29T02:35:00.000-05:00Looks like the vegas moneylines are pretty much dead on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-89018422528997792752009-01-28T17:06:00.000-05:002009-01-28T17:06:00.000-05:00I'm showing 128-65-1.Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-18728237692990191832009-01-23T18:11:00.000-05:002009-01-23T18:11:00.000-05:00Forgive me if you've already posted something to this effect, but what is the efficacy of the team efficiency model for 2009, i.e. how predictive has it been?Michaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00665225661411662760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-89150741857613920122009-01-23T14:08:00.000-05:002009-01-23T14:08:00.000-05:00It is said that the playoffs are like a brand-new season. I wonder how these numbers would change if you only took into account this year's playoff games? I realize there's not enough data there to to come to any reliable conclusions, but I am curious to see what the numbers would be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com