<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post4215852095088030566..comments</id><updated>2009-08-08T07:03:49.799-04:00</updated><category term='fallacies'/><category term='quarterbacks'/><category term='Tables'/><category term='Julius Peppers'/><category term='basketball'/><category term='team rankings'/><category term='standings forecast'/><category term='Baltimore Ravens'/><category term='field position'/><category term='strategy'/><category term='community'/><category term='predictions'/><category term='player rankings'/><category term='other sports'/><category term='Washington Redskins'/><category term='Jeff Backus'/><category term='game theory'/><category term='Brian Urlacher'/><category term='general'/><category term='win probability'/><category term='player analysis'/><category term='Johnny Knox'/><category term='visualizations'/><category term='Matt Forte'/><category term='Zack Follett'/><category term='carson'/><category term='rev'/><category term='analysis'/><category term='fantasy'/><category term='cheating'/><category term='Ndamukong Suh'/><category term='QB Rating'/><category term='Detroit Lions'/><category term='Chicago Bears'/><category term='site news'/><category term='Rex Grossman'/><category term='New York Jets'/><category term='Jay Cutler'/><category term='Terrell Suggs'/><category term='draft2'/><category term='run-pass balance'/><category term='special teams'/><category term='weather'/><category term='pass rush'/><category term='overtime'/><category term='The Weekly League'/><category term='Corey Williams'/><category term='injuries'/><category term='4th down'/><category term='reviews'/><category term='Matthew Stafford'/><category term='playoff forecasts'/><category term='research'/><category term='basic'/><category term='LarDarius Webb'/><category term='team efficiency'/><category term='roundup'/><category term='game analysis'/><category term='washington post'/><category term='turnovers'/><category term='Green Bay Packers'/><category term='draft'/><category term='commentary'/><category term='offensive line'/><category term='kickers'/><category term='luck'/><category term='salary'/><category term='Game Preview'/><category term='home field advantage'/><category term='shotgun'/><category term='team analysis'/><category term='coaching'/><category term='opinion'/><category term='New Orleans Saints'/><category term='Ed Reed'/><category term='Mark Sanchez'/><category term='beating vegas'/><category term='team luck'/><category term='playoffs'/><category term='hockey'/><category term='Jameel McClain'/><category term='modeling'/><category term='kicking'/><category term='Markov Model'/><category term='running backs'/><category term='offense vs defense'/><title type='text'>Comments on Advanced NFL Stats: Win Probability Model Accuracy</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/feeds/4215852095088030566/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html'/><author><name>Brian Burke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>8</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-7800881436035475614</id><published>2009-08-08T07:03:49.799-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-08T07:03:49.799-04:00</updated><title type='text'>&amp;quot;There isn&amp;#39;t a handy goodness-of-fit stat...</title><content type='html'>&amp;quot;There isn&amp;#39;t a handy goodness-of-fit statistic to cite.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not true!   Whatever statistic is of interest (accuracy, quadratic loss, AUC, etc.) could be estimated on hold-out data.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/7800881436035475614'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/7800881436035475614'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1249729429799#c7800881436035475614' title=''/><author><name>Will Dwinnell</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03379859054257561952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='30' height='32' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_aTiM0lwqgJ4/SSJeGiSd4VI/AAAAAAAAAB4/i588ZVHvEz4/s1600-R/n509614243_406121_6479.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1798584201'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-5599792931674181218</id><published>2009-07-29T18:02:34.685-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-29T18:02:34.685-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Mark-Welcome back. No idea. I&amp;#39;m guessing we us...</title><content type='html'>Mark-Welcome back. No idea. I&amp;#39;m guessing we used similar data sets, so if there were quirks in the data they&amp;#39;d probably show up in any model.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/5599792931674181218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/5599792931674181218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1248904954685#c5599792931674181218' title=''/><author><name>Brian Burke</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1577162429'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-1964831909120043391</id><published>2009-07-29T01:56:30.196-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-29T01:56:30.196-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hey - just came back to the site for the first tim...</title><content type='html'>Hey - just came back to the site for the first time in the offseason. In our WP probability, we ran the exact same graphs as above with identical results. My one question - do you have any idea why the greatest diversion points are at ~20% and 80% ? We observed a similar phenomena....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Mark Kamal (Protrade - mkamal@protrade.com )</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/1964831909120043391'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/1964831909120043391'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1248846990196#c1964831909120043391' title=''/><author><name>Mark Kamal</name><uri>http://www.protrade.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1792907744'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-8274517953316878646</id><published>2009-07-19T05:47:59.396-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-19T05:47:59.396-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Nice blog . i kept it as a bookmark. thanks a lots...</title><content type='html'>Nice blog . i kept it as a bookmark. thanks a lots.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/8274517953316878646'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/8274517953316878646'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1247996879396#c8274517953316878646' title=''/><author><name>motorcycle chargers</name><uri>http://www.powersuppliesonline.co.uk/product/multi-vehicle-1</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1486915843'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-2339042638307630383</id><published>2009-07-09T14:03:51.634-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T14:03:51.634-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Brian,have you tried to running a WP calibration u...</title><content type='html'>Brian,have you tried to running a WP calibration using an atypical group of games,for example a group where there is a very strong home favourite.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your observed tight symmetry may be a reflection of the make up of the non training set very closely resembling the make up of the training set.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Systematic errors in these kind of data driven models usually become more evident when you apply them to extreme match ups.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/2339042638307630383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/2339042638307630383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1247162631634#c2339042638307630383' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-509564769'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-3093209243626706512</id><published>2009-07-07T17:26:08.527-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T17:26:08.527-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Ian-True. If I add in a HFA adjustment, even one d...</title><content type='html'>Ian-True. If I add in a HFA adjustment, even one done badly, the confidence levels will improve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;81-Probably not. The model&amp;#39;s achilles heal currently is 4th down decisions late in games. It has a hard time telling when teams will actually go for it. The WPs can be drastically different if a team kicks or goes for it. In that case, DEN went for it and won.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/3093209243626706512'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/3093209243626706512'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1247001968527#c3093209243626706512' title=''/><author><name>Brian Burke</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1577162429'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4450678693071744603</id><published>2009-07-07T17:13:31.897-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T17:13:31.897-04:00</updated><title type='text'>So in the Broncos 39-38 win over the chargers last...</title><content type='html'>So in the Broncos 39-38 win over the chargers last year, your model has the chargers winning that game 99% of the time at one point. Did the Broncos really only have a 1% chance there?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/4450678693071744603'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/4450678693071744603'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1247001211897#c4450678693071744603' title=''/><author><name>81Trucolors</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02280571817548405090</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='15343688685906676798'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Dkz7ZmAqtgs/SVWOy9MXLKI/AAAAAAAAAPc/9JGmGJA7gU8/S220/sepia.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1857791480'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-3094389058422719315</id><published>2009-07-07T11:21:42.673-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T11:21:42.673-04:00</updated><title type='text'>With regard to improving general accuracy, would y...</title><content type='html'>With regard to improving general accuracy, would you look to add in some form of adjustment to take account of home-field advantage?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suppose with that one major issue is how you fade out home field advantage and bring in game situation (i.e. at the start of the game, the home team wins more often than away teams, but if the scores are tied at the start of the fourth quarter we&amp;#39;d expect somewhere closer to 50-50, although home teams probably slightly ahead)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/3094389058422719315'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/4215852095088030566/comments/default/3094389058422719315'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html?showComment=1246980102673#c3094389058422719315' title=''/><author><name>Ian</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/07/win-probability-model-accuracy.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-4215852095088030566' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38600807/posts/default/4215852095088030566' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1473319483'/></entry></feed>
