tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post7029169611987142178..comments2007-12-24T14:44:46.971-05:00Brian Burkenoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-66433339051981141302007-12-24T14:44:00.000-05:002007-12-24T14:44:00.000-05:00This is great stuff! Keep up the great work. You've just got to love Garrard!<BR/><BR/>Could it be possible to have the ratings without the rushing being involved? Or is there an easy way to take a way the rushing from the equation? I would like to know who are the best pure passers.Samponoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-8740714740390683842007-12-24T08:02:00.000-05:002007-12-24T08:02:00.000-05:00"Romo has more ints, twice as many fumbles, and a lot more sack yds."<BR/><BR/><BR/>Yes this is true, however Romo has a higher y/att number.<BR/>I am not sure how to go about looking at this, but I will take the higher risk higher reward guy every time.<BR/>The importance of throwing for 8.0+ yards per pass cannot be underestimated.<BR/>Its pretty hard to find a team that threw for over 8 y/att and did not score a bunch of pointscoldbikemessengernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-88369846011397746072007-12-24T00:08:00.000-05:002007-12-24T00:08:00.000-05:00Are you sure? What if Anderson had TO or Barber to pass to? What if Romo played on the Browns?<BR/><BR/>Romo has more ints, twice as many fumbles, and a lot more sack yds.<BR/><BR/>But you could be right. I'm high on Romo. And I'd bet Anderson is having one of those one-year-wonder-flash-in-the-pan years, but I could be wrong.Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-12721661429626615762007-12-23T23:42:00.000-05:002007-12-23T23:42:00.000-05:00Brian, I rally like your work,<BR/>but Anderson netter than Romo?<BR/>No.<BR/>Not in this life, not in the next.coldbikemessengernoreply@blogger.com